Skip to content
Onshore, offshore, and deep water wind

Bigger turbines shouldn't mean bigger cranes. Install new turbines. Service the fleet already standing. Exchange floating turbine components in place. No tow to port.

Eliminate the largest crane on every wind project, onshore and offshore.

Taller turbines and heavier components, installed and serviced without heavy-lift cranes or vessels. Conventional cranes and installation vessels are hurting the economics at today's installation and maintenance scale, and are being challenged by new heights and weights.

Sample fixed-foundation offshore project · 15 MW reference, 67 units · based on real project values

Reference turbine

15 MW

Installation campaign vs WTIV

$152M lower

Validated by

Arup · Kent Engineering · ABS

Cost figures are modeled from real project values. Arup, Kent Engineering, and ABS reviewed the load modeling and structural design, not the cost model.

lower onshore install cost
48%
lower offshore install cost
74%
LCOE reduction contribution
Up to 10%
Why now

Targets are rising.
Lift capacity is not.

Triple

Global wind capacity needs to triple by 2030 to meet net-zero pathways.

IEA, GWEC

425 GW

EU REPowerEU and UK Net Zero offshore + onshore wind targets by 2030.

European Commission, UK BEIS

20-year fleet

A growing share of installed turbines is reaching end-of-design-life this decade.

GWEC, BloombergNEF


The problem

The lift is the bottleneck.

Onshore towers keep getting taller and components heavier, on sites that are harder to reach. Offshore nacelles are approaching 1,000 tons. Conventional cranes scale exponentially with both height and component weight. Only five vessels in the world can install and service a 15 MW turbine, and they're booked on new builds.

The result is delayed deployments, higher levelized costs, and a major component replacement backlog that grows daily as the global fleet ages.

CLS Wind addresses the lift itself, with a platform that scales linearly with height and reuses the lower-cost cranes, vessels, and local crews operators already have. It is built on more than 70 years of proven offshore oil and gas jack-up platform engineering. Two products, one platform principle: KINKA LIFT for onshore work, ORCA LIFT™ for fixed and floating offshore.

FIG. 01 · Crane needed vs hub height

Taller breaks conventional cranes. Not us.

Crane to lift it to hub height: lattice crawler, assembled on site 600 t class
With CLS Wind: the crane lifts to about 10 m only 160 t class

Crawler crane, or a 250 t class road-mobile crane.

Smallest class whose published load chart covers the lift. Site practice often goes a class higher for rigging, lift radius, and wind margin.

The taller the hub, the bigger the crawler crane. With CLS Wind the crane lift stops near the ground and the platform carries the component the rest of the way.

Crane lift

140 m → 10 m

Where the load goes

Conventional crane

Load goes into
The ground
Limited by
Crane size and reach, which grow fast with height
Needs
Hardstanding, site access, a large mobilization

Tower-mounted crane or climber

Load goes into
The tower
Limited by
What the tower can carry
Needs
A tower able to take the extra load

CLS Wind

Load goes into
The foundation
Limited by
Sized to the job
Needs
A short crane lift to the platform
Illustrative. Crane classes from Liebherr's published load charts (wind brochure 2022; LTM and LR technical data at 10 m radius), before hook block and rigging. Offshore figures from Arup's CAN DO study (2026).
The platform principle

Three ideas, one platform.

Whether onshore, fixed offshore, or floating offshore, the vertical loads go into the foundation rather than the tower. They route through CLS Wind structural chords into the foundation, monopile, or floater, which is why existing turbines, new turbines and retrofit candidates are all compatible.

§ 01

Foundation-bearing

Vertical lift loads route through structural chords into the foundation, monopile, or floater, rather than the tower.

§ 02

Largely bypassed

The existing tower is largely bypassed as a load path. The tower design is unchanged.

§ 03

New + retrofit

The same platform installs new turbines and services existing fleets. Validation transfers across comparable geometries.

Validation

Third-party load-modeled. Approval in Principle in hand.

Validator · 01

Arup

Third-party load modeling. 15 MW fixed offshore.

Validator · 02

Kent Engineering

Independent load modeling. 15 MW floating, three-column semi-submersible.

Validator · 03

ABS

Approval in Principle. 15 MW offshore concept.

Engage

Engaging with developers, OEMs, service companies, ports, and supply chain partners.

Across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe.